Retraction precedent
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈprɛsɪdənt/
A previously published retraction case that serves as a reference point for handling similar circumstances in current manuscript disputes or misconduct allegations. It establishes procedural and ethical guidelines for addressing comparable situations in academic publishing.
Plain English
A past example of a retracted paper that helps editorial teams decide how to handle similar problems in new cases.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editorial board referenced a retraction precedent from a similar data fabrication case when evaluating the current submission."
Style guide notes: Cite specific retraction precedents by date and journal when establishing editorial policy consistency.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How do retraction precedents influence current decisions?
They provide consistent standards for evaluating misconduct severity and determining appropriate editorial responses across cases.
Where can editors find documented retraction precedents?
PubMed, CrossMark, and journal archives maintain records of retractions; COPE guidelines document common precedent scenarios.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for senior editors developing consistent retraction policies and managing complex publication integrity issues.
Required skill level: Senior