Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Retraction Protocol

noun

Pronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈproʊtəkɔːl/

A standardized procedure outlining steps for identifying, documenting, and publicly withdrawing previously published articles due to scientific misconduct, severe methodological flaws, or other integrity concerns. Proper protocols maintain journal credibility and guide institutional responses.

Plain English

The formal process for removing published articles from the journal record due to serious errors or misconduct.

Etymology & History

Origin languageLatin
RootLatin retractio (withdrawal) + Greek protokollon (protocol)
First recorded use1990
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"Our journal's retraction protocol requires investigation completion and institutional notification before any public withdrawal announcement."

Style guide notes: Always refer to 'retraction notices' rather than 'retraction statements' per COPE standards.

Also known as

withdrawal procedure article removal protocol retraction process

Contrasted with

publication approval continued circulation

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers a retraction?

Fabricated data, plagiarism, duplicate publication, serious methodological errors, or undisclosed conflicts of interest warrant retraction consideration.

Are retracted articles completely removed?

No; articles remain publicly accessible with clear retraction notices explaining withdrawal reasons for scientific record integrity.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Essential for understanding ethical publishing practices and maintaining academic journal credibility standards.

Required skill level: Senior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON