Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Retraction Statement Protocol

noun phrase

Pronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈsteɪtmənt ˈproʊtəˌkɔːl/

A standardized procedural framework governing how journals formally withdraw previously published articles due to scientific misconduct, errors, or other integrity concerns. The protocol specifies documentation requirements, stakeholder notification procedures, and archival modifications to maintain research integrity and transparency.

Plain English

Guidelines for how journals formally remove published papers and explain why they're being withdrawn.

Etymology & History

Origin languageEnglish
Rootretraction (Latin retractio) + statement (Latin statum) + protocol (Greek protokollon)
First recorded use2000s
Usage frequencyUncommon

Usage

"The journal implemented a retraction statement protocol compliant with COPE guidelines to address the fraudulent data."

Style guide notes: Always use 'retracted' not 'rejected' when describing withdrawn articles, and include COPE reference guidelines.

Also known as

withdrawal procedure article removal protocol retraction guidelines

Contrasted with

publication approval acceptance procedure

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

What should a retraction statement include?

Article identification, reason for retraction, responsible parties, and verification of notice to indexing databases.

Who decides if an article requires retraction?

Editorial board in consultation with authors, institutions, and potentially external experts depending on allegation severity.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Critical for understanding journal accountability and proper handling of research integrity violations.

Required skill level: Senior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON