Retraction Workflow
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈwɜːrkfloʊ/
The standardized procedural sequence followed when a journal must withdraw or retract a previously published article due to errors, misconduct, or other serious issues. This process includes investigation, author notification, stakeholder communication, and publication of a formal retraction notice.
Plain English
The step-by-step process a journal follows to officially remove a published paper from the scientific record.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The retraction workflow required 90 days to complete all investigations and notify affected institutions."
Style guide notes: Document retraction workflows in a separate institutional SOP; retraction notices should include DOI and clear rationale.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggers a retraction workflow?
Confirmed scientific fraud, serious methodological errors, duplicate publication, or author requests for withdrawal initiate formal retraction.
How transparent should retraction workflows be?
Best practices require public retraction notices explaining reasons clearly while protecting confidential investigation details.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for editorial integrity, institutional liability management, and understanding research ethics enforcement mechanisms.
Required skill level: Senior