Reviewer anonymity protection
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər əˈnɑːnɪmɪti prəˈtɛkʃən/
The editorial practice of concealing peer reviewer identities from authors throughout the review process and publication, maintaining confidentiality to encourage honest feedback and prevent bias. This principle is fundamental to double-blind review systems in academic publishing.
Plain English
Keeping the names of expert reviewers secret from the paper's authors to ensure honest feedback without fear of retaliation.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Reviewer anonymity protection ensures that critics can provide candid assessments without fear of professional retribution."
Style guide notes: Use 'reviewer anonymity protection' as a noun phrase; avoid conflating with author anonymity in single-blind reviews.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Can authors request reviewer identities be revealed?
No, reviewer anonymity is protected by editorial policy in most journals.
What happens if reviewer identity is accidentally disclosed?
Journals investigate breaches and may implement confidentiality protocols to prevent future incidents.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Critical for understanding ethical peer review practices and journal quality assurance mechanisms.
Required skill level: Mid