Reviewer Anonymity Protocol
noun phrasePronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər əˈnɑnɪmɪti ˈproʊtəˌkɔl/
A systematic procedure that protects the identity of peer reviewers while allowing authors to receive feedback, maintaining objectivity in evaluation. The protocol specifies how reviewer information is handled, shared, and archived throughout the review process.
Plain English
Guidelines that keep peer reviewers' identities secret from authors to ensure fair and unbiased feedback.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our journal's Reviewer Anonymity Protocol ensures that authors never learn their reviewers' identities during the evaluation process."
Style guide notes: Capitalize Protocol; specify single-blind vs. double-blind distinction for clarity.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Reviewer Anonymity Protocol apply to all manuscripts?
Most journals apply it to standard submissions; some offer open review as an alternative option for authors.
Can reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity?
Yes; reviewers may choose to sign their reviews, though most remain anonymous for objectivity protection.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Crucial for understanding peer review mechanisms, research ethics, and editorial standards in academic publishing.
Required skill level: Mid