Reviewer Attribution Model
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər ətˈtrɪbjuːʃən ˈmɒdəl/
An editorial framework that determines whether peer reviewers' identities are disclosed to authors, ranging from single-blind to open review formats. The model selected impacts reviewer accountability, author response patterns, and publication transparency.
Plain English
A system that determines whether authors know who reviewed their manuscript.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal recently transitioned to an open reviewer attribution model to increase transparency and reviewer accountability."
Style guide notes: Use 'reviewer attribution model' in lowercase unless part of a formal policy title.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What attribution models exist?
Single-blind (reviewers anonymous), double-blind (mutual anonymity), and open models (identities revealed) are most common.
How does attribution affect reviewer behavior?
Open attribution increases accountability and constructive feedback quality but may reduce willingness to critique senior authors.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Critical for understanding peer review transparency options and their editorial implications.
Required skill level: Mid