Reviewer Attribution Policy
noun phrasePronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər ætɪˈbjuːʃən ˈpɑːlɪsi/
The editorial framework that determines whether peer reviewers receive public credit or remain anonymous for their contributions to manuscript evaluation. Policies range from fully blind review to open attribution with reviewer identity disclosed.
Plain English
Rules deciding whether reviewers' names are published or kept secret when they evaluate manuscripts.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal adopted a transparent reviewer attribution policy to recognize peer review contributions in author-accessible databases."
Style guide notes: Specify the attribution model type when referencing particular journal policies.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the benefits of transparent reviewer attribution?
Recognizes reviewer contributions, incentivizes quality reviews, builds scientific accountability, and enhances reviewer reputation.
What are risks of publishing reviewer identities?
Potential reviewer bias, reduced candor in critiques, conflicts of interest, and vulnerability to author retaliation.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding varying approaches to reviewer transparency and peer review ethics across journals.
Required skill level: Mid