Reviewer Consensus Report
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər ˈkɒnsɛnsəs rɪˈpɔːrt/
A compiled summary document integrating feedback from multiple peer reviewers with the editor's synthesis of their comments and recommendations. It provides authors with clear guidance on required revisions and the editorial rationale for acceptance or rejection decisions.
Plain English
A summary combining all reviewer comments and the editor's overall decision to help authors understand what needs fixing.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The reviewer consensus report indicated that major revisions were needed before resubmission."
Style guide notes: Use clear, objective language when synthesizing consensus; maintain confidentiality of individual reviewer identities.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Should all reviewer comments appear in the consensus report?
Editors typically synthesize main points; confidential reviewer identities remain protected.
Can authors disagree with the consensus report?
Yes, they can provide detailed rebuttals explaining their response to reviewer suggestions.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Demonstrates understanding of editorial communication processes and revision management workflows.
Required skill level: Mid