Reviewer Consent Protocol
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər kənˈsɛnt ˈprəʊtəˌkɔːl/
A standardized procedure for obtaining explicit agreement from reviewers regarding confidentiality obligations, conflict of interest status, and ethical conduct before manuscript assignment. This ensures informed participation and establishes accountability for reviewer responsibilities.
Plain English
Getting formal agreement from reviewers that they understand their duties and will follow ethical rules before assigning them a paper.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The reviewer consent protocol requires acknowledgment of confidentiality before manuscript access is granted."
Style guide notes: Use 'consent protocol' when referring to the formal procedure; distinguish from individual consent statements.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What must reviewers agree to in consent protocol?
Confidentiality, ethical conduct, conflict disclosure, timeliness, and manuscript handling procedures are standard consent elements.
Why is reviewer consent protocol important?
It creates documented evidence of reviewer accountability and protects journals from ethical violations and liability claims.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding legal and ethical frameworks governing peer review relationships and reviewer obligations.
Required skill level: Mid