Reviewer Invitation and Response Tracking
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər ɪnˈvaɪtəʃən ənd rɪˈspɑːns ˈtrækɪŋ/
A systematic process of documenting and monitoring the outreach to potential peer reviewers, their acceptance or decline responses, and their engagement status throughout the review period. This tracking ensures timely follow-ups and maintenance of reviewer response rates.
Plain English
The system for keeping records of who is invited to review, whether they accept or decline, and how engaged they remain.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Reviewer invitation and response tracking revealed that 35% of invited reviewers failed to respond within two weeks."
Style guide notes: Use 'Reviewer Invitation and Response Tracking' as a complete phrase when referring to the formal process.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How long should editors wait for reviewer responses before follow-up?
Typically 7-14 days for initial response, with 1-2 reminder invitations spaced 5-7 days apart before seeking replacement reviewers.
What metrics should be tracked for reviewer invitations?
Response rate, acceptance rate, average time-to-response, reviewer reliability rates, and decline reasons help optimize future reviewer selection.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for evaluating manuscript processing efficiency and understanding peer review workflow optimization in editorial operations.
Required skill level: Mid