Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Reviewer Invitation Protocol

noun

Pronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər ɪnˈvɪteɪʃən ˈproʊtəkɑːl/

The standardized procedures and communication guidelines used by editors to solicit peer review participation from qualified reviewers. It includes invitation timing, content specifications, and acceptance/decline tracking.

Plain English

The formal process editors follow when asking experts to review a submitted paper.

Etymology & History

Origin languageFrench, Latin
Rootreviewer (one who views again) + invitare (to invite)
First recorded use2000s
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"Our reviewer invitation protocol requires three invitation attempts before considering alternative candidates."

Style guide notes: Capitalize Protocol when referring to specific institutional procedures.

Also known as

reviewer solicitation procedure invitation workflow reviewer recruitment process

Contrasted with

automatic assignment unplanned review

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

What information should be included in reviewer invitations?

Manuscript abstract, estimated review time, conflict-of-interest check, and journal guidelines.

How many reviewers are typically invited per manuscript?

Usually 4-6 reviewers to secure 2-3 acceptances, accounting for declines.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Critical for editorial staff roles and understanding reviewer engagement procedures.

Required skill level: Mid

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON