Platform Comparison · 2026
EditingTests.com vs Criteria Corp
Criteria Corp is a rigorous, science-backed platform for cognitive aptitude and personality assessment. EditingTests.com is the specialist for editorial skills. Here's why hiring managers use both — and when you only need one.
Choose EditingTests.com if
You need to validate actual editorial skill — editing accuracy, proofreading precision, grammar, writing quality — for a specific role.
Choose Criteria Corp if
You need broad cognitive aptitude, personality, or emotional intelligence assessment across many role types with strong psychometric validation.
The bottom line
For editorial roles, cognitive aptitude alone is not enough. The ability to reason doesn't predict the ability to edit. Specialist editorial assessment does.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | EditingTests.com | Criteria Corp |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial specialization | 100% specialist — 7 editorial assessments | Cognitive, personality, EI, risk — not editorial-specific |
| Track Changes editing environment | ✓ Realistic track-changes editor | ✗ Not available |
| Editorial benchmark | Percentiles against comparable attempts at the same test, difficulty and industry; 130,000+ assessments since 1998 | ✗ No editorial benchmark — general norms only |
| Proofreading test | ✓ Authentic published-style passages | ✗ No specialist proofreading assessment |
| Industry vocabulary test | ✓ 4,400+ sector-specific vocabulary banks | ✗ Not available |
| Grammar test | ✓ 25 expert-crafted editorial grammar questions | Verbal reasoning — not role-specific grammar |
| Writing assessment | ✓ Scored on 4 editorial dimensions | General writing ability only |
| MS Word proficiency test | ✓ Hands-on Word application tasks | ✗ Not available |
| Cognitive aptitude testing | ✗ Not in scope | ✓ Strong — CCAT and variants |
| Personality assessment | ✗ Not in scope | ✓ Strong — multiple validated frameworks |
| Emotional intelligence | ✗ Not in scope | ✓ Available |
| Human expert review | ✓ Every open-response result, before release (12 business hours) | ✗ Not available for editorial content |
| Pricing model | Pay per credit — published price, no subscription | Quote-only — no prices published |
| Pricing transparency | Public, pay-as-you-go | Quote-based — contact for pricing |
| Free trial | ✓ Try any test free, no account required | Demo available on request |
| Setup time | Under 5 minutes | Standard — requires onboarding |
| Trusted by | 21,348+ organizations since 1998 | Not published |
Cognitive Aptitude Is Not the Same as Editorial Skill
Criteria Corp's Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test (CCAT) is one of the most respected cognitive assessments in the market. It reliably predicts trainability and general cognitive ability across a wide range of roles. For editorial positions, however, the predictive value has a ceiling.
A candidate may score exceptionally on cognitive aptitude while failing to apply Chicago style consistently, missing structural problems in a complex sentence, or struggling to work at editorial pace under deadline conditions. Cognitive aptitude predicts the ability to learn. Editorial skill assessments measure whether that learning has occurred.
Criteria's instruments are designed to measure general cognitive ability and personality across many kinds of role, which is what makes them useful for broad screening. They are not editorial tests, and they do not claim to be. EditingTests.com handles the specialist skills-testing layer that follows.
When to Use Both
Many editorial hiring teams use both platforms at different stages. Criteria Corp handles early-stage cognitive and personality screening across a broad candidate pool. EditingTests.com provides the specialist editorial testing once candidates reach the skills assessment stage.
This combination works well for high-volume publishing or media hiring: cognitive aptitude filters the field, editorial skill tests confirm the shortlist.
Pricing Transparency
Criteria Corp pricing is quote-based — every paid edition is listed as "Contact Us" rather than a price (checked 25 August 2026). EditingTests.com pricing is public, pay-per-credit, and starts at a single assessment. For small teams or occasional hiring, the difference in commitment is significant.
What Criteria Corp Cannot Provide for Editorial Hiring
Track Changes Editing
Cognitive aptitude tests measure reasoning; they do not ask a candidate to mark changes in a real document. EditingTests.com provides a genuine track-changes editing environment for editorial assessment.
28-Year Editorial Benchmark
Criteria Corp provides norms based on general working populations. EditingTests.com provides percentile rankings against comparable attempts at the same editorial test, difficulty and industry, with the size of that group shown on every report.
Industry Vocabulary Testing
For roles in legal publishing, academic publishing, or specialist media, domain vocabulary is a core editorial competency. Criteria Corp has no equivalent to our Industry Vocabulary Test across 4,400+ sectors.
About the comparisons on this page
We do not list competitor prices, plan limits or founding dates; see each company's own site for those. Feature comparisons describe what each product publicly documents. If you find something out of date here, tell us at [email protected] and we will correct it.