Skip to main content

Platform Comparison · 2026

EditingTests.com vs Toggl Hire

Toggl Hire is a candidate-friendly, transparent skills testing platform. EditingTests.com is the specialist editorial assessment standard. The key difference is depth: broad skills testing versus 28 years of editorial-specific benchmarking.

Choose EditingTests.com if

You're hiring for editorial roles and need specialist assessments, benchmarked percentile scores, and a track-changes editing environment.

Choose Toggl Hire if

You're hiring across many roles — marketing, development, design, sales — and want a transparent, candidate-friendly ATS with built-in skills testing.

The bottom line

Toggl Hire's transparency and candidate experience are genuinely strong. But for editorial hiring, a 15,000-question general library cannot replicate 28 years of specialist editorial data.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature comparison: EditingTests.com against Toggl Hire
Feature EditingTests.com Toggl Hire
Editorial specialisation 100% specialist — 7 editorial assessments General skills platform — no dedicated editorial tests
Track Changes editing environment ✓ Realistic track-changes editor (ET, FEA) ✗ Not available
Editorial benchmark database 130,000+ candidates, 28 years ✗ No editorial benchmark
Proofreading test ✓ Authentic published-style passages ✗ No specialist proofreading assessment
Industry vocabulary test ✓ 4,400+ sector-specific vocabulary banks ✗ Not available
Question library 7 specialist editorial assessments, refined over 28 years 15,000+ general questions across 200+ skills
Candidate results transparency ✓ Full percentile report with skill breakdown ✓ Candidates see their score immediately
Human expert review ✓ Every open-response result, before release (12hr SLA) ✗ Automated only
ATS included ✗ Assessment specialist — integrates via API ✓ Full ATS + pipeline management included
Video interviews ✗ Assessment specialist ✓ Async video interviews included
Pricing model Pay per credit — no subscription Free ($0); Starter $199/mo; Premium $349/mo (checked 25 Aug 2026)
Free plan ✓ Try any test free, no account required ✓ Free plan (1 skill test, 5 users)
Credits / assessments expire? Never — credits never expire N/A — subscription model
Anti-cheat measures Fullscreen, tab detection, clipboard block, server-side timing Standard anti-cheat measures
Results benchmark External 130,000-candidate database Internal — candidates compared to each other
Setup time Under 5 minutes Fast — pre-built templates available
Founded 1998 2017

Where Toggl Hire Gets It Right — and Where It Can't Go

Toggl Hire deserves genuine credit for two things that matter: transparent candidate results and accessible pricing. Candidates see their full score breakdown immediately after completing a Toggl Hire test — a candidate experience that builds goodwill and reduces drop-off. EditingTests.com shares this philosophy: our reports are equally transparent, with full percentile breakdowns sent to both the employer and, where appropriate, the candidate.

Toggl Hire's free plan and straightforward paid pricing also compare favourably to TestGorilla's company-size-based model. For a generalist hiring tool, it offers strong value.

The limitation is depth. Toggl Hire's 15,000-question library is broad — covering coding, marketing, sales, customer support, and more. But it has no specialist editorial tests. There is no track-changes editing environment, no proofreading test using authentic published passages, no industry vocabulary test across 4,400+ sectors, and no benchmark database of editorial professionals to rank candidates against.

The Benchmark Problem

Toggl Hire ranks candidates against each other within your own assessment pool. If you've sent the test to 20 candidates, you see how 20 people compare. EditingTests.com ranks every candidate against 130,000+ editorial professionals tested over 28 years. That context is what allows you to say with confidence that a candidate is in the 78th percentile — not just that they scored higher than 14 of your 20 applicants.

ATS + Assessment: Different Tools for Different Jobs

Toggl Hire combines ATS pipeline management with skills testing in one platform. EditingTests.com is an assessment specialist that integrates into your existing ATS via API. For teams that need a full hiring pipeline tool, Toggl Hire has clear advantages. For teams that already have an ATS and need best-in-class editorial assessment, EditingTests.com is the right specialist layer.

Three Things Toggl Hire Cannot Offer Editorial Teams

Track Changes Editing

Toggl Hire tests skills through multiple-choice, open-ended, and video questions. EditingTests.com provides a genuine track-changes editor — the environment your editorial candidates will actually work in.

28-Year Editorial Benchmark

Toggl Hire compares candidates to each other. EditingTests.com compares them to 130,000+ editorial professionals across 28 years of testing. That benchmark is what makes results defensible to hiring managers and legal teams.

Specialist Anti-Cheat

Our anti-cheat suite — fullscreen enforcement, tab-switch detection, clipboard lock, and server-side timing — was built specifically for the high-stakes editorial assessment context. Results are tamper-evident and legally defensible.

The Editorial Benchmark Toggl Hire Can't Provide

130,000+ candidates. 28 years. 7 specialist assessments. Try EditingTests.com free — no account required.

About the figures on this page

Competitor pricing was read from each company's own public pricing page on . Prices change, and several of these companies do not publish them at all — where that is the case we say so rather than estimate. Feature comparisons describe what each product publicly documents. If you find something out of date here, tell us at [email protected] and we will correct it.

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON