Platform Comparison · 2026
EditingTests.com vs Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a candidate-friendly, transparent skills testing platform. EditingTests.com is the specialist editorial assessment standard. The key difference is depth: broad skills testing versus 28 years of editorial-specific benchmarking.
Choose EditingTests.com if
You're hiring for editorial roles and need specialist assessments, benchmarked percentile scores, and a track-changes editing environment.
Choose Toggl Hire if
You're hiring across many roles — marketing, development, design, sales — and want a transparent, candidate-friendly ATS with built-in skills testing.
The bottom line
Toggl Hire's transparency and candidate experience are genuinely strong. But for editorial hiring, a general question library cannot replicate 28 years of specialist editorial data.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | EditingTests.com | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial specialization | 100% specialist — 7 editorial assessments | General skills platform — no dedicated editorial tests |
| Track Changes editing environment | ✓ Realistic track-changes editor (Editing Test and Full Editing Assessment) | ✗ Not available |
| Editorial benchmark | Percentiles against comparable attempts at the same test, difficulty and industry; 130,000+ assessments since 1998 | ✗ No editorial benchmark |
| Proofreading test | ✓ Authentic published-style passages | ✗ No specialist proofreading assessment |
| Industry vocabulary test | ✓ 4,400+ sector-specific vocabulary banks | ✗ Not available |
| Question library | 7 specialist editorial assessments, refined over 28 years | A broad library of general questions across many skills |
| Candidate results transparency | ✓ Full percentile report with skill breakdown | ✓ Candidates see their score immediately |
| Human expert review | ✓ Every open-response result, before release (12 business hours) | ✗ Automated only |
| ATS included | ✗ Assessment specialist — integrates via API | ✓ Full ATS + pipeline management included |
| Video interviews | ✗ Assessment specialist | ✓ Async video interviews included |
| Pricing model | Pay per credit — no subscription | Free plan plus monthly subscription plans |
| Free plan | ✓ Try any test free, no account required | ✓ Free plan available |
| Credits / assessments expire? | Never — credits never expire | N/A — subscription model |
| Anti-cheat measures | Fullscreen, tab detection, clipboard block, server-side timing | Standard anti-cheat measures |
| Results benchmark | Comparable attempts across the whole platform, group size shown | Internal — candidates compared to each other |
| Setup time | Under 5 minutes | Fast — pre-built templates available |
Where Toggl Hire Gets It Right — and Where It Can't Go
Toggl Hire deserves genuine credit for two things that matter: transparent candidate results and accessible pricing. Candidates see their full score breakdown immediately after completing a Toggl Hire test — a candidate experience that builds goodwill and reduces drop-off. EditingTests.com shares this philosophy: our reports are equally transparent, with full percentile breakdowns sent to both the employer and, where appropriate, the candidate.
Toggl Hire's free plan and straightforward paid pricing also compare favorably to annual-commitment subscriptions. For a generalist hiring tool, it offers strong value.
The limitation is depth. Toggl Hire's question library is broad — covering coding, marketing, sales, customer support, and more. But it has no specialist editorial tests. There is no track-changes editing environment, no proofreading test using authentic published passages, no industry vocabulary test across 4,400+ sectors, and no benchmark database of editorial professionals to rank candidates against.
The Benchmark Problem
Toggl Hire ranks candidates against each other within your own assessment pool. If you've sent the test to 20 candidates, you see how 20 people compare. EditingTests.com ranks every candidate against comparable attempts at the same test, difficulty and industry across the whole platform, and shows the size of that group. That is what lets you say a candidate is in the 78th percentile of a stated group — not just that they scored higher than 14 of your 20 applicants.
ATS + Assessment: Different Tools for Different Jobs
Toggl Hire combines ATS pipeline management with skills testing in one platform. EditingTests.com is an assessment specialist that integrates into your existing ATS via API. For teams that need a full hiring pipeline tool, Toggl Hire has clear advantages. For teams that already have an ATS and need best-in-class editorial assessment, EditingTests.com is the right specialist layer.
Three Things Toggl Hire Cannot Offer Editorial Teams
Track Changes Editing
Toggl Hire tests skills through multiple-choice, open-ended, and video questions. EditingTests.com provides a genuine track-changes editor — the environment your editorial candidates will actually work in.
Editorial Benchmark
Toggl Hire compares candidates to each other. EditingTests.com compares them with comparable attempts at the same test, difficulty and industry across the whole platform, and shows the size of that group. That gives hiring managers a comparison a raw score cannot.
Specialist Anti-Cheat
Our anti-cheat suite — fullscreen enforcement, tab-switch detection, clipboard lock, and server-side timing — was built specifically for the high-stakes editorial assessment context. Results are timestamped and tamper-evident.
About the comparisons on this page
We do not list competitor prices, plan limits or founding dates; see each company's own site for those. Feature comparisons describe what each product publicly documents. If you find something out of date here, tell us at [email protected] and we will correct it.