Retraction Advisory Process
noun phrasePronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ədˈvaɪzəri ˈproʊsɛs/
A formalized procedure by which journals investigate, document, and communicate the removal or correction of previously published articles due to scientific error, fraud, ethical violations, or publisher error. This process protects research integrity while providing transparency to the scientific community.
Plain English
The official system for identifying, investigating, and announcing when a published paper needs to be removed or corrected due to serious problems.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal initiated its Retraction Advisory Process after discovering statistical inconsistencies in the published methodology."
Style guide notes: Distinguish 'retraction' (complete removal) from 'correction' (amendment of published article) in all Retraction Advisory Process discussions.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggers the Retraction Advisory Process?
Triggers include fraudulent data, major methodological errors, ethical violations, duplicate publication, and undisclosed conflicts of interest.
How long does Retraction Advisory Process typically take?
Timeline varies from weeks to months depending on investigation complexity and stakeholder responses.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Assesses knowledge of research integrity enforcement and ethical publication standards in academic journal management.
Required skill level: Senior